Death to the Death Penalty Essay -- Capital Punishment, Death, Lethal

When Michael Ryan was sentenced to destruction, We were sentenced to (Kelle, a.n.d, par.2). Keeping him tied outside to a deck with no coat to freeze in the winter cold, disemboweling him with a shovel to shooting stumble each one of his fingers, James Thimm was tortured to death (Kelle,2009). We imagine that as each day went past the pain would weaken. But that wasnt the case for Miriam Thimm Kelle and his family. Michael Ryan the killer of Jim, were sentenced to the death penalty but little did Miriam know he was also sentenced. For some 20 years Michael Ryans execution was carried out through every supplication on and on. The pain that Kelles family inflicted was insufferable. As unfortunate as the occurrence was it is safe to say this continues to be the pain of many murder victims families. The death penalty provides nothing but pain for the victims family, the economy and the society. There are multiple reasons why one should be against the death penalty. For a society that wants to be civilized, set people to death does not solve that problem. Thinking that its helping, the death penalty actually creates a whole new set of victims. Mistakes are made because cases invariably turns out to be innocent. The death penalty is often used as a discriminatory tool for poor, blacks, and other specifics. Like life imprisonment the death penalty is no more deterrent. Theres always the possibility of rehabilitations no matter how evil the crime was. It is hypocritical and against the law to kill someone but the conjure up still do. The overall quality of life is bad in a society where the death penalty is used. And when this whole ordeal is put into play it brings wad the society as whole. Most murders committed are largely outweare in the heart of the moment. The homicide regularize is at least five times greater in the united states than in any western European country (Carter, 2012, part.4). No where does studies show a substantial net deterrent effect from uppercase punishment under modern U.S. conditions. In fact 88.2% of polled criminologists do not believe that the death penalty is a deterrent (Rodelet,2009, p.3). Im sure that persons contemplating murder do not sit around and say hey you know what I wont commit this murder because Ill face the death penalty. No, planned murders dont plan on getting caught. They either weigh the consequences, death penalty, life without parole. States without the death penalty have a lower murder rate than states with it. 10 of the states without capital punishment have homicide rates below the national average (Bonner, Fessenden,2000). The death penalty is not a deterrent. Its usually single used on the poor or disadvantaged people. The poor, minorities, and members of racial, ethnic, and religious communities are directly effected under the state of the International criminal court espouse in 1998, the death penalty is excluded from the punishments (Amnesty International the , n.d). Deter rence plays no part. According to a survey of the former and present presidents of the countrys top academic criminological societies, 84% of these experts rejected the notion that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder. (Radelet & Akers, 1996)Victims are sentenced to death after unfair trials. The death penalty has been and continues to be used as a tool of political repression. Its used to silence forever political opponents or to eliminate politically troublesome individuals. The usual Declaration of Human Rights recognizes each persons right to life. No one should be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or corrupting treatment or punishment (Human Rights 5 ) The death penalty violates these rights. The death penalty is not an act of self-defense. It is in fact the premeditated killing of a prisoner who could be dealt with by less... ...ons is excited. Instead families feelings are remorsefully saddened for executions. Over and over studies have shown that the dea th penalty does not work as deterrence to crime. And costs are so driven up by death penalty cases. Ultimately the death penalty is a permanent death consent. wherefore murder others for murders? It doesnt make any sense to. BIBLIOGRAPHY Kane, Gregory. To murder victims families, executing killers is justice.baltimoresun.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Apr. 2014. . Bonner, Raymond, and Ford Fessenden. States Without Death punishment Have Lower Homicide Rates. commondreams. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Sept. 2000. .McCafferty, James. 2009. Capital penalization. Death Penalty. Amnesty International USA. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .Meehan , Mary . Ten reasons to oppose the death penalty. America Magazine . N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Nov. 1982. Manderu, Evan. 2011. Capital Punishment America.infoplease. Infoplease. Infoplease, n.d. Web. 29 Apr. 2014. Amendment VIII Benjamin Rush, On Punishing Murder by Death. Amendment VIII Benjamin Rush, On Punishing Murder by Death. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Apr. 2014. .Dieter, Richard . The Death Penalty in Black and White Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides. DPIC. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .Kronenwetter, Micheal 2001 Capital Punishment

Exploring Traumatic Brain Injury in Children Essay -- Medicine

Traumatic headspring injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability among children and adolescents (Yeates, 2005). The Center for Disease and Control (2010) reported an estimated 1.7 million individuals sustaining TBI each year with 51% of these injuries occurring during periods of cerebral development. Children (0-4 years), older adolescents (15-19 years) and older adults (65+ years) are most likely to sustain TBI (CDC, 2010). conceiver injuries often lead to severe, pervasive, and potentially irreversible impairments in singles neurological, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning (e.g., Wilde et al, 2012 Yeates, 2005). This analysis will examine the etiology, prevalence, and impact of traumatic brain injury in the developing brain of children.Classifications & Diagnosis of TBIBrain injuries can be classified into three different categories mild, moderate, and severe TBI. Classification is mostly done using the Glasgow coma outperform (GCS) which has gained broad acceptance for the judgment of the severity of brain damage (Bauer & Fritz, 2004). This scale is ground on a 15 point scale which measures individuals level of consciousness based on verbal, motor, and eye responses to stimuli, as well as the overall social dependence on others. One study scrutinized the elements of the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) from 27,625 TBI cases in Taiwan. A correlation was found between the survival rate and certain eye (E), motor (M) and verbal (V) score combinations for GCS (scores of 6, 11, 12, ) that were discerned to be statistically significant. This illustrates that the fundamental elements comprising the Glasgow coma scale (E, M, & V) are predictive of the survival of TBI patients. The researchers assert that this observation is cli... ...sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138309005609)Wilde, Merkley, Bigler, Max, Schmidt, Ayoub, McCauley, Hunter, Hanten, Li, Chu, Levin, Longitudinal changes in cortical thickness in children after traumatic brain injury and their relation to behavioral regulation and emotional control, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, Volume 30, Issue 3, May 2012, Pages 267-276, ISSN 0736-5748, 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2012.01.003.(http//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736574812000044)Yeates, Armstrong, Janusz, Taylor, Wade, Stancin, Drotar, Long-Term financial aid Problems in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Volume 44, Issue 6, June 2005, Pages 574-584, ISSN 0890-8567, 10.1097/01.chi.0000159947.50523.64.(http//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890856709616336)